Topic: SHOULD GEORGE BE SACKED?

[martinvic]

It's always someone else isn't it George, you are always the victim.

With your antics George you've had many more than 3 strikes, so just go.

[George]

Hatred filled footer you say  , it just proves that you are not really cut out for the job.

So you approve of Onions hatred-filled, footer then?

[Gav Iscon]

I certainly don't think its hatred filled or outrageous.

[livo]

No but it is certainly very directed, aimed, intended and whatever else fits.  Remember that offense is taken and not given, even if it was intended.

[Peripatetic Phil]

To the question of the thread topic. Simple answer is NO, or at least not because some may think he should be.  Only Admin can make that decision.

Yes, only Stu. can make that decision.  But ordinary members such as you and I are free to express our opinion.  That is our democratic right.

** Phil.

[Onions]

For example, nobody has complained that Onions has an outrageous footer, attacking me, and appearing nearly 700 times on all his posts.

George, in respect to your feelings, I have changed my sig.

[livo]

Well that's a constructive and helpful contribution onions. Not.

[Onions]

Using the phrase 'constructive and helpful contribution' in the context of defending Geo is perhaps a non sequitur, livo.

[curryhell]

I can hear the shouts of "CA is back" already but i can live with that.  I am beginning to feel as though I work for HMP as I seem to be on a bit of a lockdown mission at the moment.  Those members that chose to participate in this thread and / or in the other related thread have had their say.  I feel there is nothing to be gained by the posting of any further remarks.  Are there any objections to this and the other thread being locked?

[Gav Iscon]

Fine by me.